Research series

Who decides what is true?

Twenty-six connected research articles on authority, evidence, propaganda, institutional learning, uncertainty, and concrete religious and organizational cases. The series separates claims, evidentiary standards, and documented findings and is designed for sequential or standalone reading.

26 articles Completed series
Who Decides What Is True? Part 1 / 26
Series sequence

26 articles in reading order

Series chapter

I. Methodological foundation

The first ten articles establish tools for assessing authority, evidence, identity, enemies, institutions, expertise, consensus, and uncertainty.

10
Series chapter

II. Prophecy and the closed world

Two bridge articles examine what happens when a prediction fails and when a group becomes the primary framework for understanding the world.

2
Series chapter

III. Doctrinal and institutional cases

Comparative studies of Jehovah’s Witnesses, Mormonism, the Unification Church, and Aum Shinrikyo/Aleph apply the same evidentiary framework to different kinds of claims and organizational practices.

4
Series chapter

IV. Comparative case studies

Jonestown, Waco, Heaven’s Gate, the Order of the Solar Temple, and NXIVM show different combinations of authority, belonging, conflict, isolation, and control.

5
Waco Part 18 / 26

Waco

The Branch Davidians Between Apocalyptic Theology, a Failed Raid, a 51-Day Siege, and a Deadly Fire

Read article
NXIVM Part 21 / 26

NXIVM

When “Personal Growth” Becomes a Hierarchy of Obedience and a Secret Structure Becomes a System of Coercion

Read article
Series chapter

V. Extended institutional cases

Scientology, Children of God / The Family International, FLDS, Twelve Tribes, and Shincheonji are additional cases examined with the same behavioral and evidentiary standard without automatically equating them.

5